By Olivia Bisa Tirko, President of the Autonomous Territorial Government of the Chapra Nation.
The following op-ed was originally written for and published in The Banker.

In the first days after assuming the presidency of the Autonomous Territorial Government of the Chapra Nation, in Peru, in August 2022, I faced a daunting challenge: an oil spill from the North Peruvian Pipeline contaminated the Morona River, a source of life for my territory. Just a few minutes of spillage were enough to wipe out species that lived there and cut off access to water for all the communities in the region.
These tragedies reveal an undeniable truth: no matter how much money is mobilised, the social, environmental, cultural and economic damage caused by oil extraction is irreversible.
Similarly, every dollar that banks allocate to fossil fuels is also irreversible. It does not matter if they invest in cultural or social and environmental projects in an attempt to greenwash their image. It is the financing provided by major banks that keeps the destructive fossil fuel machinery in our territories running.
Since the adoption of the Paris agreement in 2016, banks have provided more than $15bn in direct financing for oil and gas in the Amazon, according to data published by non-profit Stand.earth. With every new drilling, road opened, or pipeline installed — which in most cases happens without our “free, prior and informed consent”, a principle protected by international human rights standards — the Amazon inches closer to a point of no return and the climate crisis worsens.
If there are still doubts about this, I invite the bank executives to come to my territory and see it with their own eyes.
Indigenous peoples, especially women, who contribute the most to mitigating the climate crisis, suffer its impacts disproportionately. However, the consequences go far beyond our territories: no human being will be able to survive if the Amazon continues to be devastated, because global food security and climate balance depend on it. No bank executive will survive eating gold, drinking oil and breathing smoke. Valuing the Amazon means valuing their own existence.
The role of banks in the transition
In recent years, I have met with the main banks responsible for financing oil and gas in the Amazon to expose the irreversible impacts their resources have enabled. Although some simply close their doors to dialogue, we have achieved some progress over the years.
Petroperú invested over $6bn — with financing from JPMorgan, Bank of America, Santander and HSBC, according to research by Stand.earth — to expand the Talara Refinery and process 95,000 barrels of oil per day. This oil would be extracted from the Amazon, including from my own territory. But after years of Indigenous resistance, led by women, we have succeeded, for now, in preventing oil extraction from Block 64 in the Peruvian Amazon, which gives me hope.
Despite resistance from various countries to advancing the definition of a pathway and timeline to phase out fossil fuels at COP30 in Belém, it is clear that no viable future includes expansion of this sector. While the world continues to debate the long-promised roadmap, banks should know their first step: to stop financing fossil fuels, especially in biodiverse areas that are vital to the planet, like the Amazon.
The adoption of an Amazon geographic exclusion policy by banks, as BNP Paribas has done, shows that a more responsible pathway is possible. Through this policy, the flow of financial resources to extractive activities in the region has been reduced, although not entirely eliminated.
Just a few weeks ago, the top financier of oil and gas in the Amazon, JPMorgan, added restrictions on fossil fuel financing in the rainforest and improved its Indigenous peoples’ rights policies. But in this case, it is a gesture — not a real transformation. We won’t stop the climate crisis with small steps. Beyond adopting policies, it is imperative that banks fulfil their commitments and do their part now.
As the Amazon faces a surge in oil and gas expansion, Indigenous peoples and our allies are calling for the rainforest to be urgently recognised as an exclusion zone for all extractive activities. We demand that banks adopt robust exclusion policies, both at the project and corporate levels, for any extractive company operating in the Amazon.
We still have time to save the planet and the lives of our children and future generations. After so many years of destruction, why can’t we start working to protect it?
All banks mentioned in the article were contacted for comment. JPMorgan, Santander and Bank of America declined to comment