Stand.earth scorecard fails fashion industry on efforts to tackle climate change
August 24, 2021
47 companies assessed for steps taken to eliminate fossil fuels from manufacturing, materials, shipping
SAN FRANCISCO — In the wake of a global pandemic and a devastating new IPCC report that reinforced a growing consumer demand for corporations to act on the climate crisis and protect public health, Stand.earth’s first annual Fossil-Free Fashion Scorecard released today shows how companies are failing in their efforts to tackle climate change.
As a multi-trillion dollar industry whose greenhouse gas emissions are expected to drastically increase in the coming decades, the scorecard reveals that fashion companies are not doing enough to move from climate commitments to actions at the scale desperately needed.
Read the report: https://fashion.stand.earth
“The runway is getting shorter for companies to move from commitments to actions, and take the steps necessary to drastically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in the next decade. If fashion companies truly care about solving the climate crisis, they need to phase out coal power from their supply chains and say goodbye to fossil fuel fabrics like polyester,” said Muhannad Malas, Senior Climate Campaigner at Stand.earth.
The scorecard assesses 47 fashion companies on the steps being taken to eliminate fossil fuels from manufacturing, materials, and shipping processes. The results show that sportswear brands are leading the race, with Mammut (B-) ranking highest overall, followed by Nike (C+), and a tie between Asics (C), PUMA (C), Levi’s (C), and VF Corp (C). By contrast, popular yoga brand Lululemon (D-) flunked the scorecard for taking no meaningful action to get rid of coal and deploy renewable energy in the manufacturing of its products.
“Lululemon’s continued dependence on fossil fuels poses a significant investor and brand risk, and is inconsistent with its values. As a rapidly growing healthy lifestyle brand, Lululemon has a critical opportunity to rise to the top and become a climate leader by committing to ditch coal and invest in a rapid transition to renewable energy.” said Malas.
Other sportswear brands that received poor grades include Columbia (D-), Gap (Athleta) (D), New Balance (D), and Under Armour (F). In fast fashion, the world’s biggest brand Zara (D) ranked very poorly for its increasing dependence on cheap, fossil fuel fabrics like polyester and for demonstrating little progress in decarbonizing its manufacturing.
The scorecard measures the performance of global fashion companies across five areas: climate commitments and transparency; renewable and energy-efficient manufacturing; renewable energy advocacy; low-carbon materials; and greener shipping.
Among the top 10 performing companies across all areas, none scored higher than a B-. Eight are sportswear companies — Mammut, Asics, Nike, PUMA, VF Corp, adidas, Arc’teryx, and Patagonia — with Levi’s and H&M also included in the top 10. Other key findings by area:
Climate commitments: Companies are not setting strong enough climate targets, putting the industry on a trajectory far surpassing the 1.5C pathway recommended by the U.N. Paris Agreement. Only three companies assessed — Asics, Mammut, and REI — have committed to slashing absolute emissions across the supply chain by 55% or greater by 2030 (the goal recommended by the U.N.).
Renewables in manufacturing: The industry continues to rely heavily on coal to power its manufacturing processes, contributing to rising climate emissions and air pollution in countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh. Few companies reported meaningful steps toward financial incentives or direct investments for suppliers to purchase renewable energy, but seven companies assessed — Mammut, Nike, Asics, Levi’s, adidas, Esprit, and PUMA — ranked highly in this section for setting renewable energy targets in their supply chains or working with manufacturing partners to phase out coal-fired boilers. A broad range of companies loudly tout efforts to deploy renewable energy in their headquarters and stores, but these decarbonization efforts only account for a small percentage of their climate pollution.
“Fashion companies in Vietnam contribute to the majority of national exports, attract foreign investment, and create plenty of domestic jobs. As an important energy user, the fashion sector plays a crucial role in accelerating energy transformation — which is happening globally and across all industries. Deploying renewable energy is a smart and financially feasible solution to reduce production costs and increase competitiveness, when participating in green production supply chains across global market and to contribute efforts to achieve net zero by 2050 in the Paris Agreement,” said Nguy Thi Khanh, Executive Director of GreenID and a Goldman Environmental Prize winner.
Renewables advocacy: Companies are not doing enough to seek better access to renewables from governments in countries where factories are located. Despite this lack of progress, advocacy opposing new investment in coal-fired electricity was an important bright spot, with several companies signing on to letters to Cambodia cautioning against plans to increase coal-fired power and to Vietnam seeking a pilot program for purchasing renewables. Notably, H&M, Levi’s, and VF Corp signed both letters, contributing to their high ranking in this section.
Low-carbon materials: Many companies have recently announced “sustainable material” commitments to phase out virgin polyester or other fossil fuel fabrics such as nylon, but are doubling down on fibers recycled from plastic waste, which prevents them from fulfilling any promises of circularity as these fibers are ultimately destined for the landfill. Several sportswear and fast fashion companies assessed — including Lululemon, Under Armour, Zara, and Uniqlo — will face major challenges in transitioning to low-carbon materials since fossil fuel-derived fabrics like polyester make up a large proportion of their materials mix.
Greener shipping: The fashion industry is one of the largest customers of ocean and air shipping, which contributes to significant air pollution worldwide. With the industry’s shipping needs expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades, it’s imperative for companies to advocate for zero-emissions vessels and infrastructure. Fewer than half, only 20 companies assessed — including Adidas, Mammut, Nike, and PUMA — included shipping in their supply chain emissions reduction targets. Swiss outdoor gear brand Mammut set a new precedent in the sector by being the only company to commit to switching to zero-emission shipping vessels by 2030.
The 47 companies assessed in the scorecard were chosen for their participation in various climate and sustainability initiatives. They are: Adidas, ALDO, Allbirds, American Eagle Outfitters, Arc’teryx, Armani, Asics, Boohoo, Burberry, C&A, Capri Holdings, Chanel, Columbia, Eileen Fisher, Esprit, Everlane, Gant, Gap, Guess, H&M, Hugo Boss, Inditex, Kering, Levi’s, Lululemon, LVMH, M&S, Mammut, MEC, New Balance, Nike, On Running, Patagonia, Pentland, Prada, Primark, PUMA, PVH, Ralph Lauren, REI, Salomon, Salvatore Ferragamo, SKFK, Under Armour, UNIQLO, VAUDE Sports, VF Corp.
In August 2020, Stand.earth released its Roadmap to Fossil-Free Fashion, outlining the steps the industry must take to get a handle on its rapidly growing carbon footprint by identifying five critical focus areas. (The 2021 Fossil Free Fashion Scorecard utilized these areas to measure performance.)
From 2017-2018, Stand.earth ran its “Too Dirty to Wear” campaign calling on denim giant Levi’s to clean up the climate pollution in its supply chain. In July 2018, Levi’s made a groundbreaking climate commitment to slash emissions in its global supply chain by 2025, meeting Stand.earth’s demands.
Media contact: Virginia Cleaveland, Stand.earth, email@example.com, +1 510 858 9902